Macfarlane lying over used Japanese cars, says expert

Claims that allowing used Japanese cars into Australia would reduce road safety are simply nonsense, says the car review website dogandlemon.com.

Editor Clive Matthew-Wilson, who has extensively studied the New Zealand experience with used imports, says:

“Used Japanese imports were the best thing that ever happened to the New Zealand consumer.”

“In the late 1980s, New Zealanders went from driving rusty old death-traps to driving relatively modern cars. Now, with about half the New Zealand fleet coming second-hand from Japan, New Zealanders wouldn’t have it any other way.”

Matthew-Wilson, whose road safety research was awarded by the Australian Police Journal, says the safety argument is simply a smokescreen.

“The argument that used imports will lower safety is simply nonsense. The government merely needs to require that used imports meet modern safety standards. It’s that simple. The cheap and nasty used imports would never be sent to Australia anyway – they tend to be sent to places like Russia and Africa, where buyers are more worried about price.”

“Not all Japanese imports would be cheaper: there are already some used car bargains in Australia. However, overall, the consumer would undoubtedly benefit due to increased competition.”

Matthew-Wilson says comments by Federal Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane suggest the Abbot government is keen to protect its friends in the car industry.

“Japanese imports would probably lower the price of Australian used cars by about 10–30%. The established car industry doesn’t want that to happen, so they’ve lobbied the government heavily to reject the findings of the Productivity Commission. The winners here are the established car companies. The losers are the Australian consumers.”

Disclosure of interest: nil.